So I've been told that since I've labeled myself the "Generic Geek" that I am no longer generic... The language center at
Merriam-Webster OnLine gives the definition of "generic" as:
Function: adjective
Etymology: French générique, from Latin gener-, genus birth, kind, class
Date: 1676
1 a : relating to or characteristic of a whole group or class :GENERAL b : being or having a nonproprietary name c : having no particularly distinctive quality or application
2 : relating to or having the rank of a biological genus
- ge·ner·i·cal·ly /-i-k(&-)lE/ adverb
- ge·ner·ic·ness noun
The reasoning behind this assertion is, because I have labeled myself "generic" that I now have a particularly distinctive quality, and that I'm no longer truley "generic". I know I meet at least one of the criteria: Definition 2: Relating to or having the rank of a biological genus. If you look at the Biological Classification levels of the Linnean heirarchy:
Kingdom
Phylum (plural phyla)
Class
Order
Family
Genus (plural genera)
Species
Then, I am in the Family of Hominidae, and my Genus and species are Homo & sapiens, so does this mean that per the definition that everyone in a particular genus is "generic"???
But, Definition 1C is "having no particularly distinctive quality or application" I definetly have a distinctive quality, I'm a geek, so how can I be generic, if my distinctive quality is being "geeky"? And I have lots of applications, I've got MS Office, Photoshop, etc... too many to list right now.... So by using this definition, I can't be "generic".
Recent comments
34 min 23 sec ago
34 min 45 sec ago
9 hours 13 min ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago
1 day 5 hours ago